Home

About us
Introduction
Our Staff
Our Offices
Our News
In The Media
In the House of Lords
Testimonials
updated!

Past Cases: research stories new

Solicitors & Executors
Introduction and Services
Finding Beneficiaries
Missing Beneficiary Insurance
Estate Distribution
Costs

Information for Heirs
Introduction
Probate Research
Why We Contacted You
Costs
Time Line
More Information

More
Contact Us
Links
Terminology
Frequently Asked Questions


Choose a language

Simon & Nathan Fraser Victory
in the House of Lords

Fraser and Fraser
Genealogists and International
Probate Researchers

House Of Lords - School Sites ActHouse of Lords Victory for Simon & Nathan Fraser
London, 27th October 2005

 

 Press Release

Following our success in the House of Lords, we were flooded with calls from journalists.

Click here to read the press release we issued.


  Transcript of the judgment

The United Kingdom Parliament: Judgment
Click here to read the official transcript of the judgement


 Media Coverage

Click here to read quotations from the news stories, and to see links (where applicable) to the relevant websites.

The Practical Lawyer Dec 05 / January 2006
Trust & Estate Practitioner December 2005
Channel 4 News 7 November 2005
Estates Gazette 5 November 2005
Solicitors Journal 4 November 2005
The Church Times (2 articles) 4 November 2005
The Independent - Law Report 2 November 2005
The Times Law Report 31 October 2005
The Daily Telegraph 29 October 2005
The Times 29 October 2005
The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales 28 October 2005
BBC Radio Kent 28 October 2005
   
Local papers:  
Western Daily Press Somerset 28 November 2005
The Ross Gazette 24 November 2005
The Gloucestershire Echo 15 November 2005
Sheerness Times Guardian 3 November 2005

 Legal Counsel:

Christoper Nugee QC & Caroline Furze representing Fraser & Fraser (instructed by William Blakeney)

Christopher McCall QC & Vivian Chapman representing the CDBF (instructed by Furley Page)


  The Law Lords

The Law Lords on the Appellate Committee for the case:
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead
Lord Hoffmann
Lord Hope of Craighead
Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood


  The CDBF Financial Position

The Canterbury Diocesan Board of Finance Financial Position (2004)
Tangible fixed assets                                   £5,665,767  *
Investments                                                    £5,010,371
Total funds carried forward to 2005            £11,456,801 **

* Please note that this figure is the market value on the date it was vested in the board. Historical gifts of land could therefore be grossly undervalued.

** This figure contains “Tangible fixed assets” which may be grossly undervalued


The debate that some of the students were not poor:
“Mr Harris’s father, who worked for the local electricity board, lived in a middle class street and owned his home. A friend of his whose father was a police inspector, came from a similar home.” The CDBF used the rateable value of houses to determine if the street  was middle-class, however, Lord Hoffman said “the rateable value of the house was not a sure guide to the affluence of the occupants because many appear to have been in multiple occupation or to have included shops”.

Additional quotation from Lord Walker
“That proviso as to reverter must have been a valuable encouragement, because landowners by reason of it were thus enabled to ensure that the site should be used in perpetuity for school purposes, or, if it ceased to be used for school purposes, that they would get it back. The common sense of that is obvious”